There is a huge amount
of difference between the style and approach of
1 Maccabees, when compared to 2 Maccabees.[1]
Whereas 1 Maccabees attempts to be a relatively
objective historical analysis of the events that
befell the Jewish people, the compiler of 2
Maccabees attempts to show his audience a
theological perspective of what took place. In 1
Maccabees, while we may encounter Judah Maccabee,
and his brothers Jonathan and Simon, as
appealing to past Israelite history for
inspiration—in 2 Maccabees we see the
omnipotence of God working directly through the
Jewish people. They are His servants, put in
dire straights, who will be vindicated
throughout eternity because of their
faithfulness to Him and to His Torah. The
Maccabees appeal to God to intervene when hope
appears lost. We get a glimpse into the lives of
some of the “normal people” who suffered under
the tyranny of the Seleucid Empire.
Unlike 1 Maccabees, 2
Maccabees covers a much shorter historical
period of about fifteen years, from right before
the ascension of Antiochus V, son of Antiochus
Epiphanes, to about 160 B.C.E. 2 Maccabees
4:7-15:36 parallels much of 1 Maccabees chs.
1-7. 2 Maccabees claims to have originally been
part of a larger, five volume work no longer
extant, that had been written by a Jason of
Cyrene. 2 Maccabees was condensed by an editor
or Epitomist, who certainly interjects his
thoughts as he summarizes what he considered to
be the main points of Jason’s original work. The
original audience of 2 Maccabees is the Jewish
community of Egypt (1:1-2:18), and so because of
this, the editor or Epitomist of 2 Maccabees is
sometimes thought to be a contemporary of the
Jewish philosopher Philo,[2]
placing 2 Maccabees’ composition sometime in the
late First Century B.C.E. or early First Century
C.E.
The emphasis of the
editor is to focus on the people who fought and
were martyred during the Seleucid period,
something he does quite well. Yet because of
this, it may be that he was more concerned with
his literary abilities than with attention for
the historical detail originally laid out in
Jason’s work. Some interpreters of 2 Maccabees
feel that the Epitomist may have exaggerated
some of the facts and figures, superimposing his
own religious ideas onto the actual events, as
he details that his focus was “on the main
points of my outline, [and] I shall leave to the
original author the minute discussion of every
particular” (2:28). Reading 2 Maccabees as a
literary work first, and not necessarily
historical, will aid us for understanding the
people of the time—even if the events have been
clouded in flowery language. Unfortunately, we
do not have Jason’s work to make a proper
comparison, so the accuracy of whether various
miracles or supernatural works actually took
place, will need to be considered by you
as you read the text for yourself.
Let us remember,
though, as R.K. Harrison observes, “the
Epitomist performed a valuable service in
preserving the bulk of a work that is no longer
extant. His condensation was admittedly meant
for popular consumption, and the gratitude with
which it was received”[3]
led to the Greek text of 2 Maccabees translated
into other contemporary languages. The accounts
preserved in 2 Maccabees undeniably affected
First Century Jewish theology, and the worldview
of many Jews during the ministry of Yeshua. For
that reason alone, today’s Messianic community
needs to be familiar with it.
A main purpose of 2
Maccabees is to persuade the Jewish community in
Egypt to continue to remember the Festival of
Dedication, which they had forgotten to do. The
editor begins his work by writing two letters,
the first being a general letter to the Egyptian
Jews, expressing a desire for their well being
(1:1-6). He also appeals to the past crises
experienced by the Judean Jews, and even how the
original author Jason took up arms against his
own people who had defected to the Seleucids
(1:7). God intervened on their behalf, as “We
prayed to the Lord and were answered; we brought
a sacrifice and an offering of fine flour, we
lit the lamps, and laid out the Bread of the
Presence” (1:8). The role that the Temple
plays is quite important for the Epitomist of 2
Maccabees. Reminding the Egyptian Jews of
the faithful actions of their Judean brethren,
he says, “Now we instruct you to observe the
celebration of a feast of Tabernacles in the
month of Kislev” (1:9), as what would become the
eight-day celebration of Chanukah was
partially modeled after Sukkot, something
they would have been familiar with from the
Torah.
The second, and much
longer letter, is written to Aristobulus (1:10),
who was some kind of a Jewish teacher or
philosopher to Ptolemy IV Philometor (180-145
B.C.E.) of Egypt. Thanks are issued to God for
saving the Jews from the invaders (1:11-12). The
Epitomist records an interesting death, or at
least fall, of Antiochus Epiphanes, much
different than that recorded in 1 Maccabees
6:1-17. While in Persia, Antiochus had “a force
that seemed invincible,” but “they were cut to
pieces in the temple of the goddess Nanaea[4]
through a stratagem employed by her priests. On
the pretext of a ritual marriage with the
goddess, Antiochus, escorted by his Friends, had
come to the temple to secure the considerable
treasure by way of dowry...As soon as he was
inside, the priests shut the sanctuary; then,
opening a secret trapdoor in the panelled
ceiling, they hurled stones at them, and the
king fell as if struck by a thunderbolt. They
hacked off limbs and heads and threw them to
those outside” (1:13-16). In the Epitomist’s
words: “Blessed in all things be our God, who
handed over the godless to death!” (1:17).
He also goes into
describing to Aristobulus how significant it
would be for the Egyptian Jewish community to
observe the Festival of Dedication “on the
twenty-fifth of Kislev, so that you may
celebrate a feast of Tabernacles” (1:18a), as
Sukkot would again serve as an appropriate
prototype for what would become Chanukah.
(It may be that references to Sukkot are
made, so that the Egyptian Jews would have a
frame of reference for remembering the much
newer commemoration of Chanukah.) A
considerable part of the Epitomist’s letter is
spent discussing how the sacred fire that was to
be used in the Temple had been preserved during
the period of the Babylonian exile, invoking a
sense of nostalgia for the Temple worship that
had continued in spite of the hardship that the
Jews had faced (1:18-2:12).[5]
He affirms that the account of how the fire was
preserved during the Exile is available for the
Egyptian Jews to see, no differently than the
chronicles of Israel’s kings and the works of
David (2:13), as well as the relevant documents
that concerned the recent conflict between the
Jews and Seleucid Greeks (2:14-15). The
Epitomist summarizes the importance of what he
is about to deliver, writing,
“Since we are about to
celebrate the purification of the temple, we are
writing to impress upon you the duty of holding
this festival. God has rescued his whole people
and granted to all of us the holy land, the
kingship, the priesthood, and the consecration,
as he promised by the law. We have confidence
that God will soon show us compassion and gather
us from everywhere under heaven to the holy
place, for he has delivered us from great evils
and purified that place” (2:16-18).
The Epitomist’s
opening commentary is over with these two
letters, and he can now begin his summary of
Jason of Cyrene’s original five-volume work
(2:19a). He records how Jason not only compiled
a history of Judah Maccabee and his brothers,
but also the war that the Maccabees fought
against Antiochus Epiphanes and his successors
(2:19b-20). Apparently, Jason’s work also
included supernatural encounters that the
Maccabees had. Jason is said to have “described
the apparitions from heaven which appeared to
those who, in the cause of the Jewish religion,
vied with one another in heroism. Few though
they were, they ranged through the whole
country, taking booty and routing the foreign
hordes; they recovered the world-renowned
temple, liberated the city of Jerusalem, and
reaffirmed the laws, which were in danger of
being abolished. All this they achieved because
the Lord showed them clemency and favour”
(2:21-22).
In reviewing the
Epitomist’s work, he reminds those reading that
his is a condensed summary for which he slaved
over day and night: “The task which I have taken
on myself in making this summary is no easy one;
it means hard work and late nights” (2:26). And
we are reminded again, we no longer have access
to Jason of Cyrene’s original volumes (2:28), to
which we can compare. The Epitomist proceeds,
comparing himself not to the architect of a
house, but rather one who (artfully) paints
inside it (2:29).
Unlike 1 Maccabees,
which begins principally with the rise of
Alexander the Great and the division of his
empire following his death, the narrative of 2
Maccabees tells us more of the internal issues
going on in Judea. Apparently, Antiochus
Epiphanes’ ordered defilement of the Temple was
not the first action taken by a Seleucid
monarch. The Epitomist details how during the
administration of the Jewish high priest Onias,
“the Holy City enjoyed unbroken peace and
prosperity, and there was exemplary observance
of the laws, because he was pious and hated
wickedness. The kings themselves held the
sanctuary in honour and embellished the temple
with the most magnificent gifts; King Seleucus
of Asia even met the whole cost of the
sacrificial worship from his own revenues”
(3:1-3). Apparently, there had been a time when
there were excellent relations between the Jews
and their various Greek neighbors.
The first problems
erupt when a certain Simon, administrator of the
Temple, has a quarrel with Onias over the
Jerusalem city market. Perhaps envious of power,
he goes to Apollonius, governor of Coele-Syria
and Phoenicia (3:4-5), telling them that the
treasury of Jerusalem was filled with untold
riches, riches that could belong to the Seleucid
king (3:6). Apollonius informs the king of what
he has been told, who then sends an official
named Heliodorus to remove the Temple riches
(3:7). Heliodorus embarks on an inspection tour
of the region, and is received warmly by the
Jews when he reaches Jerusalem (3:8-9). He asks
about the allegations of the Temple treasury
hording tax monies, and so the high priest
explains how the funds are largely held for
disbursement to orphans and widows (3:10).
Heliodorus, however, informs that because the
king has given orders, the Temple funds must be
turned over to the royal treasury (3:13).
When the day came for
the Temple funds to be tallied and taken away,
the Epitomist records there was great distress
throughout the city—the high priest not only in
agonizing pain, but also people offering
significant prayers in sackcloth and ashes
(3:14-19). “[W]ith outstretched hands all made
solemn entreaty to Heaven. It was pitiful to see
the crowd lying prostrate in utter disarray and
the high priest in agony and apprehension”
(3:20-21). As Heliodorus prepares to appropriate
the Temple funds for the king, the prayers of
the people are heard (3:22-23). The Epitomist
says, “just as he was arriving with his escort
at the treasury, the Ruler of spirits and of all
power sent a mighty apparition, so that everyone
who had dared to accompany Heliodorus collapsed
in terror, stricken with panic before the might
of God” (3:24). Angelic beings then appear to
beat Heliodorus, so that he might stay away from
the Temple treasures:
“There also appeared
to Heliodorus two young men of surpassing
strength and glorious beauty, magnificently
attired. Taking their stand on either side of
him, they flogged him, raining on him blow after
blow. Suddenly, overwhelmed by a great darkness,
he fell to the ground, and his men quickly took
him up and placed him on a stretcher. This man,
who so recently had entered the treasury
accompanied by his whole bodyguard and an
attendant crowd, was now borne off utterly
helpless, publicly compelled to acknowledge the
sovereignty of God” (3:27-28).
The Jews who witnessed
this praised God for His intervention (3:30),
and Heliodorus’ various companions appealed to
Onias the high priest to pray for him, so that
the Lord would spare his life (3:31). Knowing
how the king might react, Onias offered a
sacrifice for Heliodorus on behalf of the Jewish
nation (3:32). “As the expiation was being made,
the same young men, dressed as before, again
appeared to Heliodorus, and standing over him
said: ‘You should be very grateful to Onias the
high priest; it is for his sake the Lord has
spared your life. You have been scourged by God;
now proclaim his mighty power to all men.’ With
these words they vanished” (3:33-34). Heliodorus,
having been visited by two of God’s angels, then
proceeds to make “lavish freewill-offerings to
the Lord who had spared his life” (3:35), and
“To everyone he bore witness of the miracles of
the supreme God which he had seen with his own
eyes” (3:36). Returning to the king, Heliodorus
reports how the presence of God filled the
Jewish Temple, opposing those with evil intent
(3:37-39).
The incident in the
Temple treasury begins a series of unfortunate
events for the Jewish nation. Simon, who had
originally told Apollonius of the great Temple
riches, is incensed, spreading rumors about
Onias the high priest (4:1). The Epitomist
comments, “He had the effrontery to accuse of
conspiracy against the government one who was a
benefactor of the city, a protector of his
fellow-Jews, and a staunch upholder of the law”
(4:2). His supporters resort to murder (4:3),
likely killing various opponents. Apollonius
continued to encourage Simon on his course of
action (4:4), and things got so bad that Onias
feels he has no choice but to appeal to the king
himself for the sake of all the Jews (4:5). “He
saw that unless the king intervened there could
be no peace in public affairs, nor would Simon
be stopped in his mad course” (4:6).
King Seleucus dies and
is succeeded by his brother Antiochus, who would
also be known as Epiphanes (4:7a). As this takes
place, “Jason, Onias’s brother, procured for
himself the office of high priest by underhanded
means” (4:7b). Jason, the new high priest,
promises Antiochus great sums of money (4:8-9a).
Add to this how Jason actually asks the new king
for permission “to set up a gymnasium for the
physical education of young men, and to enrol in
Jerusalem a group to be known as ‘Antiochenes’”
(4:9b), as though they were citizens of the
capitol Antioch. We see that “The king gave his
assent; and Jason, as soon as he had secured the
high-priesthood, made his fellow-Jews conform to
the Greek way of life” (4:10).
The previous
allowances for the Jews, which had been
negotiated by John, the father of Eupolemus,[6]
were set aside by Jason (4:11a). The Epitomist
records all of the dastardly deeds done by this
new “high priest,” which were anti-Torah and
which affected many of the Jews who looked to
the Temple for spiritual guidance:
“He abolished the
institutions founded on the law and introduced
practices which ran counter to it. He lost no
time in establishing a gymnasium at the foot of
the citadel itself, and he made the most
outstanding of the young men adopt the hat worn
by Greek athletes. So with the introduction of
foreign customs Hellenism reached a high point
through the inordinate wickedness of Jason, an
apostate and no true high priest. As a result,
the priests no longer showed any enthusiasm for
their duties at the altar; they treated the
temple with disdain, they neglected the
sacrifices, and whenever the opening gong called
them they hurried to join in the sports at the
wrestling school in defiance of the law. They
placed no value on dignities prized by their
forefathers, but cared above everything for
Hellenic honours. This brought misfortune upon
them from every side, and the very people whose
way of life they admired and tried so hard to
emulate turned out to be vindictive enemies. To
act profanely against God’s laws is no light
matter, as will in due course become clear”
(4:11b-17).
Jason was quite
zealously inclined toward Hellenistic religion
and culture. For the games held at Tyre, he sent
a group of his Antiochenes with three hundred
drachmas of silver to be offered in the
sacrifice to Hercules (4:18-19a). These
Antiochenes, Jewish citizens of Antioch, thought
this to be improper, and so the money was
instead spent to outfit various triremes[7]
(4:19b-20).
The politics of the
region begin to play a role in how the new King
Antiochus acts toward the Jewish people. Upon
the coronation of the new King Philometor of
Egypt, he learns that Egypt is “hostile to his
interests” (4:21). Antiochus comes to Jerusalem,
being greatly welcomed by the people (4:22), and
then he moves himself to Phoenicia, obviously
wanting to take a closer look at what is
happening to the south.
As bad as Jason was as
high priest, he could not hold onto his office
indefinitely. Menelaus, a brother of the Simon
who had informed Apollonius of the great Temple
treasure, is sent by Jason to the king on
important business (4:23). “Menelaus, once in
the king’s presence, flattered him with an air
of authority, and diverted the high-priesthood
to himself, outbidding Jason by three hundred
talents of silver. He arrived back with the
royal mandate, but with nothing else to make him
worthy of the high-priesthood; he had the
passions of the cruel tyrant and the temper of a
savage beast. Jason, who had supplanted his own
brother, was not supplanted in his turn and
forced to seek refuge in Ammonite territory”
(4:24-26). The Epitomist records how things get
even more complicated with this new high priest,
Menelaus, who has no intention of paying King
Antiochus what he had promised (4:27). The funds
are continually demanded, though, and so
Menelaus is summoned to meet with the king
(4:28-29).
King Antiochus is not
there when Menelaus arrives, due to a revolt in
Tarsus and Mallus that must be put down (4:30),
and so he leaves an Andronicus behind as his
regent (4:31). Thinking that he can manipulate
Andronicus, Menelaus presents him with some
special gold from the Temple treasure (4:32).
The deposed high priest Onias had heard about
this, coming to Daphne, right outside Antioch
(4:33). Onias denounces Menelaus, and because of
this Menelaus persuades Andronicus that he needs
to be eliminated. A meeting is arranged between
Andronicus and Onias, and although Andronius
appears to greet him and gives him various
assurances of safety, “Then at once, with no
respect for justice, he made away with him”
(4:34).
The murder of the high
priest Onias, who had been a Torah-faithful Jew,
“caused indignation and resentment not only
among the Jews but among many from other nations
as well” (4:35). When King Antiochus returns
from the west, a petition protesting Onias’
murder is sent to him by the Jews of Antioch,
also considered to be “a crime detested equally
by the Gentiles” (4:36). King Antiochus is
actually described as being “moved to pity and
tears” (4:37), and he becomes so angry that
Andronicus is not only stripped of his high
position, but he is led to the very place where
Onias was murdered, and is executed there
himself (4:38).
Back in Jerusalem,
Lysimachus, brother of Menelaus and the one left
to oversee the Temple, “entered on a career of
sacrilege and plunder in Jerusalem” (4:39a). But
as this occurs, and as news reaches the people
of how much gold had been taken away and given
to Andronicus, popular opinion falls against
Lysimachus (4:39b). Lysimachus, the acting high
priest, actually assembles a force of three
thousand and orders an attack against those in
opposition (4:40). This only incenses the people
more against him. “Recognizing that Lysimachus
was behind the attack, some of the crowd seized
stones, others blocks of wood, others again
handfuls of burning embers that were lying
about, and they hurled them indiscriminately at
Lysimachus and his men. The result was that many
were wounded, some were killed, and the rout was
complete; the temple robber himself they put to
death near the treasury” (4:41-42).
When King Antiochus
comes to Tyre, charges are pressed against
Menelaus in regard to this incident (4:43-44).
Menelaus, however, is quite conniving and
manipulative, and promises a Ptolemaeus a large
sum of money if he will persuade Antiochus to
change his intent toward him (4:45-46). What
happens? The Epitomist writes, “Menelaus, the
author of all the mischief, was acquitted and
the charges brought against him were dismissed,
but the king condemned to death the unfortunate
accusers, men who would have been let go
entirely as innocent had they appeared even
before Scythians” (4:47).[8]
He can only further observe how bad Menelaus was
for the Jewish nation, stating,
“At once those who had
pleaded for their city, their people, and their
sacred vessels, suffered this undeserved
penalty. It caused even some of the Tyrians to
show their detestation of the crime by providing
a splendid funeral for the victims. Yet thanks
to the cupidity of those in power, Menelaus,
this arch-plotter against his fellow-citizens,
continued in office and went from bad to worse”
(4:48-50).
King Antiochus
undertakes a second military expedition against
Egypt (5:1), and during this time the Epitomist
relates how there were various supernatural
signs “seen in the sky all over Jerusalem”
(5:2a) for forty days. These included “galloping
horsemen in golden armour, companies of spearmen
standing to arms, swordsmen at the ready, and
squadrons of cavalry in battle order. Charges
and countercharges were made in this direction
and that; shields were brandished, spears
massed, javelins hurled; breastplates and golden
ornaments of every kind blazed with light. That
the phenomenon might portend good was the prayer
of everyone” (5:2b-4).
A false report is
heard that King Antiochus was killed in battle
(5:5a), and so the deposed high priest Jason
uses it as an opportunity, leading a surprise
attack on Jerusalem with one thousand men
(5:5b). The Epitomist observes how “Jason
embarked upon an unsparing massacre of his
fellow-citizens, for he did not grasp that
success against one’s own kin is the greatest of
failures” (5:6a). His attack against Jerusalem
is a failure, though, and he had to return to
Ammonite territory for asylum (5:7). He had to
move from place-to-place, eventually making his
way to Egypt, and then having to cross over to
Sparta[9]
where he dies in exile (5:8-9).
King Antiochus, not
having died in Egypt, hears what is going on in
Judea. What he does should be no surprise. “It
was clear to the king, when news of those
happenings reached him, that Judaea was in a
state of insurrection, and he set out from Egypt
in a savage mood. He took Jerusalem by storm”
(5:11). Over a period of three days, the
Epitomist says that eighty-thousand were
slaughtered, with about the same number sold
into slavery (5:12-14). Yet this is not enough.
“Not satisfied with this, and guided by
Menelaus, who had turned traitor to both
religion and country, the king had the audacity
to enter the most holy temple on earth. The
villain laid his polluted hands on the sacred
vessels, and profanely swept up the votive
offerings which other kings had made to enhance
the splendour and fame of the shrine” (5:15-16).
Do note, however, that this is not the
significant defilement that the Maccabees would
later have to cleanse; this is only a
ransacking of the Temple with King Antiochus
taking massive spoil away. But while this
utterly inflames the Epitomist, he is forced to
conclude that what took place was Divine
punishment from God:
“The pride of
Antiochus passed all bounds. He did not
understand that the sins of the people of
Jerusalem had for a short time angered the Lord,
and that this was the reason why the temple was
left to its fate. Had they not been guilty of
many sinful acts, Antiochus would have fared no
better than Heliodorus, who was sent by King
Seleucus to inspect the treasury; like him, he
would have been flogged and his presumption
foiled at once. But the Lord did not choose the
nation for the sake of the sanctuary; he chose
the sanctuary for the sake of the nation. That
was why the sanctuary itself had its part in the
misfortunes that befell the nation, and
afterwards shared its good fortune; it was
abandoned when the Almighty was roused to anger,
but restored again in all its splendour when the
great Master was reconciled with his people”
(5:17-20).
King Antiochus makes
his way back to the capitol at Antioch, along
with eighteen hundred talents of treasure from
the Temple (5:21a). The Epitomist offers an
editorial comment, “Carried away by arrogance he
thought that he could make ships sail on dry
land and men walk over the sea!” (5:21b).
Seleucid Greek overseers are left to watch over
Jerusalem and Mount Gerizim where the Samaritans
convened (5:22-23a). Menelaus is viewed as a
total turncoat Jew, “who was more brutally
overbearing than the others” (5:23b). The king
sends a large force into Judea to quell any
chance of rebellion, although some literary
exaggeration is likely seen in the Epitomist’s
summary: “he sent Apollonius, commander of the
Mysian mercenaries, with an army of twenty-two
thousand men; his orders were to slaughter all
the adult males and to sell the women and
children into slavery” (5:24). An incident of
how this Apollonius deceives the Jews by coming
in peace is recalled, murdering a great number
of people on the Sabbath (5:25-26). From this
incident enters Judah Maccabee onto the scene,
who escaped with nine others into the desert,
where he and his companions had to feed on wild
animals and sparse vegetation (5:27).
Shortly after, “King
Antiochus sent an elderly Athenian to compel the
Jews to give up their ancestral customs and to
cease regulating their lives by the laws of God”
(6:1). As Antiochus’ agent of evil, “He was
commissioned also to pollute the temple at
Jerusalem and dedicate it to the Olympian Zeus”
(6:2a). Even the sanctuary of the Samaritans at
Mount Gerizim was also to be dedicated to Zeus,
god of Hospitality (6:2b)—quite something to be
recorded, considering how the Jews and the
Samaritans did not get along!
What happened to the
Temple of God on Mount Zion was a hard scene
indeed to bear, and what is described in 2
Maccabees is much more detailed than simply pigs
being slaughtered on the altar. The Epitomist
summarizes how “This evil onslaught bore hard on
the people and tried them grievously, for the
Gentiles filled the temple with licentious
revelry: they took their pleasure with
prostitutes and had intercourse with women in
the sacred precincts. Moreover, they introduced
things which the law forbade, and heaped the
altar with offerings prohibited as impure. No
one was allowed to observe the sabbath or to
keep the traditional festivals or even to admit
to being a Jew at all” (6:3-6). King Antiochus’
birthday had to be honored every month (6:7a),
and the Jews were forced to participate in the
feast of Dionysius, god of revelry (6:7b). Jews
living throughout the region were ordered to do
the same (6:8), on the threat that “they should
put to death everyone who refused to conform to
the Greek ways” (6:9a).
Two horrific examples
immediately considered are the deaths of two
women who had their infant sons circumcised
(6:10), and how a group of Jews who had observed
the Sabbath in caves were burned alive, after
failing to defend themselves (6:11). The
Epitomist of 2 Maccabees is very reluctant to
mention any specific examples, observing, “I beg
my readers not to be disheartened by those
tragic events, but to reflect that such
penalties were inflicted for the discipline, not
the destruction, of our race” (6:12). Perhaps
this is an observation that simply destroying
the Jews would not be enough to convey the
greatness and superiority and divinity of
King Antiochus and his Greek culture, as the
Jews should have just followed his decrees. At
the same time, what has taken place to the Jews,
as the Epitomist thinks, may be the discipline
of God upon His people, who knew His ways and
failed to resist sin (6:13-17).
One of the most
significant incidents to consider is the example
of the aged Torah teacher, Eleazar, who refused
to forcibly eat pork (6:18). His story is one
that aptly summarizes the continued Jewish
animosity to this day toward the swine. This
often hatred toward pigs is by no means pigs’
fault; it is because the Seleucid Greeks
demanded that the Jewish people eat pork to
prove that they had turned their backs on their
God. The Epitomist recounts, “[B]ut preferring
death with the honour to life with impiety,
[Eleazar] spat it out and voluntarily submitted
to the torture. So should men act who have the
courage to reject food which despite a natural
desire to save their lives it is not lawful to
eat” (6:19-20). Eleazar’s associates tried to
persuade him that all he needed to do was to
pretend to eat pork, escaping death (6:21-22),
but Eleazar refused (6:23). Eleazar says that to
do this, at his old age, would be quite
hypocritical for the young people to witness:
“If I went through
with this pretense at my time of life, many of
the young might believe that at the age of
ninety Eleazar had turned apostate. If I
practiced deceit for the sake of a brief moment
of life, I should lead them astray and stain my
old age with dishonour. I might for the present
avoid man’s punishment, but alive or dead I
should never escape the hand of the Almighty. If
I now died bravely, I shall show that I have
deserved my long life and leave to the young a
noble example; I shall be teaching them how to
die a good death, gladly and nobly, for our
revered and holy laws” (6:24-28a).
After asserting this,
Eleazar was taken off to be tortured (6:28b),
with his former associates considering him to be
mad (6:29). At the point of death after being
beaten senseless, Eleazar would groan, “To the
Lord belongs all holy knowledge; he knows what
terrible agony I endure in my body from this
flogging, though I could have escaped death; yet
he knows also that in my soul I suffer gladly,
because I stand in awe of him” (6:30). Eleazar
then dies a martyr’s death, the Epitomist’s
eulogy being, “So he died; and by his death he
left a noble example and a memorial of virtue,
not only to the young but also to the great mass
of his countrymen” (6:31).
Another example of
martyrdom is considered by the Epitomist, one of
seven brothers and their mother who were
tortured, for failing to eat pork in violation
of the Torah (7:1). Their tenacity in not giving
in is seen in how one speaks out, “What do you
expect to learn by interrogating us? Rather than
break our ancestral laws we are prepared to die”
(7:2). This account is written as though King
Antiochus himself is present (7:3a), leading
some scholars to actually question its validity.
No location of this scene is given in the text,
so it is not impossible for the seven brothers
and their mother to have been taken to a place,
outside of Judea, where Antiochus could
personally see some of the so-called “Jewish
rabble.” Consequently, King Antiochus orders
that this brother, speaking for his family, have
his tongue cut out, and then be scalped and
mutilated in front of everyone (7:3b-4). He is
then roasted alive in the presence of his family
(7:5). All they could say to each other was,
“The Lord God is looking on...and we may be sure
that he has compassion on us. Did not Moses say
to Israel in the song plainly denouncing
apostasy, ‘He will have compassion on his
servants’?” (7:6).[10]
The second brother is
asked whether or not he will eat pork, and he
refuses to not only partake of it, but is quite
blunt in refusing to speak the torturer’s
language (7:7-8a). As he is dying, all he can
say is, “Fiend though you are, you are setting
us free from this present life, and the King of
the universe will raise us up to a life
everlastingly made new, since it is for his laws
that we are dying” (7:8b-9). He expected a life
of resurrection to come, a reward for his
steadfastness to God.
The third brother is
tortured to eat pork (7:10), but refuses with
the words, “his [God’s] laws mean far more to me
than they [the brother’s hands] do, and it is
from him that I trust to receive them again”
(7:11), meaning in the resurrection. The
Epitomist observes, “Both the king himself and
those with him were astounded at the young man’s
spirit and his utter disregard for suffering”
(7:12). After dying, the fourth brother is also
tortured (7:13). All he can say before dying is,
“Better to be killed by men and to cherish God’s
promise to raise us again! But for you there
will be no resurrection” (7:14). He either
reflected a Jewish view that the resurrection
was only for the righteous, or that the
resurrection he was to experience was one of
being ushered into God’s future Kingdom on
Earth—something the Seleucid Greek oppressors
were certainly not going to experience.
The fifth brother is
dragged forward (7:15), and what he says is very
important: “Mortal as you are, you have
authority among human beings and can do as you
please. But do not imagine that God has
abandoned our nation. Wait, and you will see how
his mighty power will torment you and your
descendants!” (7:16-17). What the sixth brother
has to say when he is brought forward is
important to consider. He acknowledges that the
Jewish people are being punished for their
crimes against God, in denying His Torah, but
also that the punishers are not going to get
away with what they are doing:
“Do not delude
yourself: it is through our own fault that we
suffer these things; we have sinned against our
God and brought these appalling events on
ourselves. But do not suppose you yourself will
escape the consequences of trying to contend
with God” (7:18-19).
The Epitomist, while
expressing high regard for these brothers, also
expresses high regard for their mother. He says,
“The mother was the most remarkable of all, and
she deserves to be remembered with special
honour. She watched her seven sons perish within
the space of a single day, yet she bore it
bravely, for she trusted in the Lord” (7:20).
She had encouraged each of her sons in their
native language, no less (7:21), and
recognized that God as their Creator would bring
them back to life again in the resurrection,
because they have been steadfast in not giving
up on His Torah (7:22-23).
King Antiochus is
sitting there, observing these things,
suspecting that although he could not understand
her words, he was being insulted (7:24a).
Knowing how far he has gone with killing six of
seven sons, Antiochus changes his tactics from
one who tortures. With only one brother left
alive, the Epitomist describes, Antiochus
“assured him on oath that once he abandoned his
ancestral customs he would make him rich and
enviable by enrolling him as a king’s Friend and
entrusting him with high office” (7:24b). King
Antiochus urges the mother to tell her surviving
son to accept (7:25), and so she finally agrees
to try (7:26). What she actually tells her son
in front of the tyrant can never be forgotten:
“I implore you, my
child, to look at the heavens and the earth;
consider all that is in them, and realize that
God did not create them from what already
existed and that a human being comes into
existence the same way. Do not be afraid of this
butcher; accept death willingly and prove
yourself worthy of your brothers, so that by
God’s mercy I may receive back both you and them
together” (7:28-29).
She barely finishes
her words, and the seventh and her final son
speaks out (7:30a). His zeal for the God of
Israel is difficult to overlook:
“What are you all
waiting for? I will not submit to the king’s
command; I obey the command of the law given
through Moses to our forefathers. And you, King
Antiochus, who have devised all manner of
atrocities for the Hebrews, you will not escape
God’s hand. It is for our own sins that we are
suffering, and, though to correct and discipline
us our living Lord is angry for a brief time,
yet he will be reconciled with his servants. But
you, impious creature, most villainous of the
human race, do not let vain hopes buoy you up or
empty delusions carry you away when you lay
hands on Heaven’s servants. You are not safe
from the judgement of the omnipotent, all-seeing
God. My brothers, after a short period of pain,
have under God’s covenant drunk of the waters of
everlasting life; but you by God’s verdict will
pay the just penalty of your brutal insolence.
I, like my brothers, surrender my body and my
life for our ancestral laws. I appeal to God to
show favour speedily to his people and by whips
and scourges to bring you to admit that he alone
is God. May the Almighty’s anger, which has
justly fallen on our race, end with me and my
brothers!” (7:30a-38).
The result of this
apologetic speech to King Antiochus causes him
to just rage, and so the seventh brother is
punished far worse than the previous six (7:39).
The Epitomist can only say, “the young man,
putting his trust in the Lord, died without
having incurred defilement” (7:40). The mother
also dies, and the editor closes his recalling
of those who were tortured for their
faithfulness to God’s Law (7:41-42).
Much of what is seen
in 2 Maccabees chs. 8-15 is paralleled by the
war accounts in 1 Maccabees. Judah Maccabee and
his brothers now enter the literary scene.
Forced into the wilderness, Judah Maccabee and
his companions recruit a force of six thousand
men, people who had remained loyal to God and to
the Torah (8:1). “They appealed to the Lord to
look with compassion on his people whom all were
trampling underfoot, to take pity on the temple
now profaned by apostates, and to have mercy on
Jerusalem, which was being destroyed and would
soon be levelled to the ground. They prayed him
also to give ear to the blood and cried blood
that cried out to him for vengeance, to keep in
mind the infamous massacre of innocent children
and the blasphemous deeds against his name, and
to show his hatred of wickedness” (8:2-4). They
all appealed to God for His deliverance, and for
discernment in how they were to proceed.
The Epitomist
considers the growing Maccabean force to be an
important tool of God, asserting, “Once
[Judah’s] band of partisans was organized, the
Gentiles found Maccabaeus invincible, now that
the Lord’s anger had changed to mercy” (8:5), as
it was time for the Jewish people to be
vindicated. “Maccabaeus came on towns and
villages without warning and burnt them down; he
recaptured strategic positions, and inflicted
many reverses on the enemy, choosing the
night-time as being especially favourable for
these attacks. Everywhere there was talk of his
heroism” (8:6-7).
The Seleucid
commissioner, Philip, was very worried about
what had started, writing to Ptolemaeus,
governor of Colele-Syria and Phoenicia, for help
(8:8). He sends Nicanor, a member of the king’s
Friends, and with him twenty-thousand troops, in
the Epitomist’s estimation, “to exterminate the
whole population of Judaea” (8:9), and with him
the general Gorgias. Profits from selling Jews
as slaves could be used to pay off some tribute
that King Antiochus still owed the Romans
(8:10-11).
When Judas and his men
heard that Nicanor was coming, many of them
deserted and fled (8:12-13), but those who
stayed, “disposing of their recent possessions,
joined in prayer to the Lord for deliverance
from the godless Nicanor, who had put them up
for sale even before any fighting took place”
(8:14). They appealed to God for His
intervention, not for what they had done, but
rather “on the ground of the covenants God had
made with their forefathers, and because they
bore his holy and majestic name” (8:15). Judah
Maccabee appealed to his force not to fall into
panic, because they had a just cause to fight
for, and for them to remember the desecration of
the Temple and suppression by Gentiles of the
Jewish religion (8:16-17). He appealed to his
army, “They rely on weapons and deeds of
daring...but we put our trust in Almighty God,
who is able with a nod to overthrow our present
assailants and, if need be, the whole world”
(8:18). Judah reminded the Maccabean army of
previous times when God had intervened, such as
the defeat of Sennacherib (8:19; 2 Kings 19:35),
and a massive defeat of the Galatians with the
Macedonians (8:20).[11]
As the Epitomist says, “His words put heart into
his men and made them ready to die for their
laws and their country” (8:21a).
In this first major
engagement recorded, Judah divides his army into
four groups, with three of his brothers—Simon,
Josephus, and Jonathan—commanding a division of
fifteen hundred (8:21b-22). A man named Eleazar
delivers a Scripture reading “from the holy
book,” crying out “God is our help” (8:23). The
Epitomist details how “With the Almighty
fighting on their side they slaughtered over
nine thousand of the enemy, wounded and disabled
the greater part of Nicanor’s forces, and routed
them completely” (8:24). The money that the
slavetraders were going to buy them with is also
seized, and the remaining enemy is pursued until
dark (8:25). They stop fighting because of the
Sabbath, then offering appropriate praise and
thanksgiving to God for the victory (8:26-27).
When the Sabbath is over, some of the spoils
they had collected are distributed among their
fellow Jews who had been persecuted, various
widows and orphans, and among the Maccabees’ own
families (8:28). “This done, all together made
supplication to the merciful Lord, praying him
to be fully reconciled with his servants”
(8:29).
The momentum of
victory continues, as “The Jews now engaged the
forces of Timotheus and Bacchides, killed over
twenty thousand of them, and gained firm control
of some of the high strongholds” (8:30a). The
Maccabees are sure to distribute the booty that
they capture to Jewish victims of the Seleucids,
orphans, widows, the elderly, and their own
growing army (8:30b). The weapons that are
captured are “carefully collected and stored at
strategic points” (8:31). The Epitomist records
the execution of an officer who was in charge of
Timotheus’ bodyguard, who “was an utterly
godless man who had caused the Jews great
suffering” (8:32). One can certainly detect that
the pains and torture inflicted upon the Jews
are returned to the Seleucid Greeks. The
Epitomist recounts, “During the victory
celebrations in their ancestral capital, they
burnt alive the men who had set fire to the
sacred gates, including Callisthenes, who had
taken refuge in some small house; so he received
the due reward of his impiety” (8:33).
Nicanor, described as
“that double-eyed villain who had brought along
the thousand traders to buy the Jewish captives”
(8:34), has to scurry away in utter defeat. The
Epitomist of 2 Maccabees has this to say about
him:
“[Nicanor] was with
the Lord’s help humiliated by the very people
whom he had dismissed as of no consequence. He
threw off his magnificent garment, and all alone
made his escape across country like a runaway
slave; he was, indeed, exceedingly fortunate to
reach Antioch after the destruction of his army.
He who had undertaken to secure tribute for the
Romans by taking prisoner the inhabitants of
Jerusalem now proclaimed to the world that the
Jews had a champion and were invulnerable,
because they kept the laws that this champion
had given them” (8:35-36).
While the Seleucid
Greek occupiers of Judea are experiencing defeat
at the hands of Judah Maccabee and his forces,
things are not going well for Antiochus
Epiphanes in his Persian campaign. The Epitomist
records how he tried to plunder the temples of
Persepolis and gain control, but the local
population rose up against him, forcing him
“into a humiliating withdrawal” (9:2).
(Apparently, the death described earlier in
1:13-17 is of Antiochus’ companions, and not
that of himself, as will be seen in ch. 9).
Retreating to Ecbatana, a report reaches King
Antiochus of how the forces of Nicanor and
Timotheus had been defeated (9:3), “and this so
roused his anger that he proposed to make the
Jews suffer for the injury inflicted by those
who had routed him” (9:4a). Antiochus Epiphanes
was so arrogant, that he actually thought that
he would make the Jewish people pay not for the
forces he had sent to fight them, but on
account of the Persians who had just defeated
him.
Antiochus is so angry,
that he pushes his charioteer not to stop until
they reach their destination (9:4b), but as the
Epitomist records, “riding with him was the
divine judgement! In his arrogance he said:
‘Once I reach Jerusalem, I will make it one big
Jewish graveyard’” (9:4c). Antiochus
Epiphanes would never make it to Jerusalem, or
even that far out of Persia. “[T]he
all-seeing Lord, the God of Israel, dealt him a
fatal, invisible blow. No sooner had he uttered
the words than he was seized with incurable
pains in his bowls and acute internal suffering”
(9:5), in the Epitomist’s view, “a punishment
entirely fitting for one who had inflicted many
unheard-of torments on the bowels of others”
(9:6). Yet, even in such pain he insisted that
the journey speed on, and became even more
vengeful and threatening against the Jews
(9:7a). This only made things worse, because “as
the chariot hurtled along he fell from it, and
so violent was his fall that he suffered agony
in every limb” (9:7b). King Antiochus was never
to be the same again, as his body would be
ravaged and he would succumb to a flesh-eating
disease. The Epitomist’s literary skills should
not be overlooked in his description:
“He, who in pretension
to be superhuman had been thinking that he could
command the waves of the sea and weigh high
mountains on the scales, was brought to the
ground and had to be carried on a stretcher. The
power of God was thus manifest to all. Worms
swarmed from the body of this godless man and,
while he was still alive and in agony, his flesh
rotted off, and the whole army was overwhelmed
by the stench of decay. It was so unbearably
offensive that no one was able to convey the man
who only a short time before had seemed to reach
to the stars in the heavens” (9:8-10).
Humiliated not only by
a recent military defeat, but now broken in
body, “Antiochus began to moderate his monstrous
arrogance; scourged by God and racked with
incessant pain, he was coming to see things in
their true light” (9:11). The Epitomist ably
describes how “He was unable to endure his own
stench,” and so he cries, “It is right for
mortals to submit to God and not claim equality
with him” (9:12). Antiochus Epiphanes was
having to recognize the superiority of God, and
how significantly presumptuous he was in his
exploits.
Antiochus Epiphanes
would not be granted any significant mercy by
God, and he was going to die (9:13), but the
Epitomist records how he recognized his error,
and reversed his approach to the Jews on his
deathbed. Antiochus vowed “that the Holy City,
which he had been hurrying to level to the
ground and transform into a graveyard, he would
publicly declare to be free; to all the Jews, a
people he had considered not to be worthy of
burial but fit only to be thrown out with their
children as carrion for birds and beasts, he
would now give privileges equal to those enjoyed
by the citizens of Athens; the holy temple,
which he earlier had plundered, he would adorn
with the most magnificent gifts, and would
replace all the sacred vessels on a much more
lavish scale, and he would meet the cost of the
sacrifices from his own revenues. In addition,
he would even turn Jew and visit every inhabited
place to proclaim God’s might” (9:13-17).
Is some of this
exaggerated? That King Antiochus would not only
give the Jews citizenship rights only enjoyed by
Athenians, but that he would convert to Judaism
himself? What we know for certain is that he
lamented his mistake against Israel’s God.
King Antiochus sends a letter to the Jewish
people, what the Epitomist considers “as a kind
of olive branch” (9:18). In this letter, he
wishes the Jews well (9:19-20), and actually
says that he keeps “an affectionate remembrance
of your respect and goodwill (9:21a). Antiochus
describes his physical illness (9:21b), and how
he has chosen a successor for himself (9:22-26).
His son, another Antiochus, will be encouraged
to follow the new policies of “moderation and
benevolence” (9:27) toward the Jews. But even
though he may have seen the proverbial “light”
in his final days, the Epitomist by no means
considers his sins atoned for. His epitaph of
Antiochus Epiphanes is, “So this murderer and
blasphemer, suffering the greatest agony, such
as he had made others suffer, met a pitiable end
in the mountains of a foreign land” (9:28).
His body was brought back, but his close friend
Philip feared the successor Antiochus (9:29).
You can definitely get
a sense from examining the remaining chapters of
2 Maccabees that the Epitomist is jumping over a
great deal of data, which Jason of Cyrene likely
elaborated on more fully. The Epitomist
summarizes how Jerusalem and the Temple precinct
were recovered by Judah Maccabee (10:1). The
pagan altars are demolished, the sanctuary is
purified, sacrifices are offered for the first
time in two years, and the worship vessels are
restored to their rightful place (10:2-3). When
the Temple practices are restored, prayer is
offered to the Lord, “that he would never again
allow them to fall into such disasters but, were
they ever to sin, would discipline them himself
with clemency rather than hand them over to
blasphemous and barbarous Gentiles” (10:4). The
Epitomist asserts how on the 25th of Kislev, the
same day on which the Temple had been previously
defiled, it was now restored to proper order
(10:5). Following the rededication, a
commemoration of what the Maccabees had done
took place, lasting eight days, not too
dissimilar from the prior remembered Feast of
Tabernacles:
“The joyful
celebration lasted for eight days, like the
feast of Tabernacles,[12]
and they recalled how, only a short time before,
they had kept that feast while living like wild
animals in the mountains and caves. So carrying
garlanded wands and flowering branches, as well
as palm-fronds, they chanted hymns to the One
who had so triumphantly achieved the
purification of his own temple. A decree was
passed by the public assembly that every year
the entire Jewish nation should keep these days
holy” (10:6-8).
We see here the
establishment of Chanukah as a unique and
special national holiday for the Jewish people.
This new Feast of Dedication originally used the
Feast of Tabernacles as a prototype for
celebration, but was to remember the liberation
and dedication of the Temple from the Seleucid
Greek occupiers of Jerusalem. Yet we are
reminded, simply because the Temple has now been
rededicated before the Lord, and is back in
working order, the conflict with the Seleucids
is by no means over. While there is
debate among interpreters whether or not the
material that follows is actually in historical
order, it still gives the reader an important
picture of how the Jewish nation was encroached
upon by adversaries.
The Epitomist moves
his readers forward, having just described the
death of Antiochus Epiphanes (10:9), now
intending to discuss the evil that his son and
successor, Antiochus Eupator, performed (10:10).
Upon becoming king, Antiochus appointed Lysias
as governor of Colele-Syria, who succeeded
Ptolemaeus (10:11). The Epitomist makes the
important observation that “Because of the
injustice formerly done to the Jews, Ptolemaeus
had taken the lead in treating them with justice
and endeavoured to maintain amicable relations
with them. For this he was denounced to Eupator
by the king’s Friends; on every side he heard
himself called traitor...He still enjoyed power,
but no longer respect, and he ended his own life
by taking poison” (10:12-13). This official, who
had favorable policies toward the Jews, was not
trusted and eventually committed suicide.
When a man named
Gorgias becomes governor of the region, “he
hired mercenaries and seized every opportunity
of attacking the Jews” (10:14). The same was
true of the nearby Idumeans, who saw an
opportunity “to foment hostilities” (10:15). The
Idumeans make themselves a prime target of the
Maccabees, as Judah Maccabee issues “public
prayers entreating God to fight on their side”
(10:16), then launching an assault on the
Idumeans. According to the Epitomist, “They
pressed the attack vigorously and captured them,
driving off those who manned the walls and
cutting down everyone they encountered. No less
than twenty thousand of the enemy were killed”
(10:17).
Nine thousand took
refuge in two forts able to withstand a siege
(10:18). Judah leaves his brothers Simon and
Josephus, along with a Zaccheus, behind to
attack, as he leaves for other areas that needed
help (10:19). The Epitomist records that
“Simon’s men were avaricious, and when they were
offered some seventy thousand drachmas by some
of those in the forts, they accepted the bribe
and let them slip through their lines” (10:20).
There is some serious controversy about this
statement because of what follows: “On being
informed of this, [Judas] Maccabaeus denounced
the men before the assembled leaders of the army
for having sold their brothers for money by
letting their enemies escape to fight again, and
he had them executed as traitors” (10:21-22a).
While the Idumean fort is destroyed, and “his
military operations were crowned with complete
success” (10:23a), it could appear that Simon as
his brother (and later successor) is a complete
failure. Yet, John R. Bartlett suggests, “If
Simon here is Judas’s brother, 2 Maccabees
discredits him utterly; but if this Simon is
included among the traitors killed, the
identification falls.”[13]
It is not impossible that this is another Simon.
Timotheus, who had
been previously humiliated by the Maccabees,
returns to attack the Jews, this time with a
force of mercenaries and cavalry (10:24). The
piety of the Maccabees is lauded: “At his
approach, [Judas] Maccabaeus and his men made
their prayer to God; they sprinkled dust on
their heads and put sackcloth around their
waists, prostrated themselves on the altar-step
and entreated God to show them favour—in the
words of the law: ‘to be an enemy of their
enemies and an opponent of their opponents’”
(10:25-26; cf. Exodus 23:22). The Maccabean
force moves a considerable distance from
Jerusalem to meet Timotheus’ army (10:27), and
as put by the Epitomist, “For the Jews success
and victory were assured, not only because of
their courage but still more because they had
recourse to the Lord, whereas the other side had
only their own fury to lead them into battle”
(10:28).
The battle ensues, and
growing more fierce the Epitomist describes how
“there appeared to the enemy five magnificent
figures in the sky, each riding a horse with a
golden bridle. Placing themselves at the head of
the Jews, they formed a circle round Maccabaeus
and kept him unharmed under the protection of
their armour, while they launched arrows and
thunderbolts at the enemy, who, confused and
blinded, broke in complete disarray” (10:29-30).
Because of this supernatural military
intervention, it is recorded that twenty-five
thousand infantry and six hundred cavalry of the
enemy are killed (10:31).
Timotheus flees to
Gazara in defeat, to a stronghold with a heavy
garrison (10:32). He is pursued by Judah
Maccabee, who lays siege to the place for four
days (10:33). As the Jews attack, “The
defenders, confident in the strength of their
position, hurled horrible and wicked blasphemies
at them until, at dawn on the fifth day, twenty
young men from the Maccabaean force, burning
with rage at the blasphemy, bravely stormed the
wall and in savage fury cut down all they
encountered” (10:34-35). This serves well for
the rest of the Maccabees who attack, as the
stronghold is taken and many are burned alive,
with the city occupied (10:36). Timotheus
himself, hiding in a cistern, too meets his end
(10:37). The Epitomist can say, “In celebration
of their achievement, the Jews praised with
hymns and thanksgivings the Lord who showers
benefits on Israel and gives them the victory”
(10:38).
This great victory
does not go without a backlash from the
Seleucids (11:1). The viceregent Lysias, musters
an army of eighty thousand, and a large amount
of cavalry, to march against the Jews. His
intention was to make Jerusalem a fully Gentile
city (11:2), including “the temple subject to
taxation like all gentile shrines and the
high-priesthood up for auction each year”
(11:3). The Epitomist observes, “Reckoning not
at all with the might of God, he was carried
away by the thought of his tens of thousands of
infantry, his thousands of cavalry, his eighty
elephants” (11:4). Invading Judea, he fortifies
himself about twenty miles from Jerusalem
(11:5).
The Epitomist narrates
how “When Maccabaeus and his men were informed
that Lysias was besieging their strongholds,
they and all the people, wailing and weeping,
prayed the Lord to send a good angel to deliver
Israel” (11:6). Judah Maccabee took up arms, and
urged his companions to do so to rescue their
fellow Jews (11:7). The Epitomist describes how
“While they were still in the neighbourhood of
Jerusalem, there appeared at their head a
horseman arrayed in white and brandishing golden
weapons” (11:8). The Maccabees’ only response to
seeing this is one of joy: “With one voice they
praised their merciful God and felt so strong in
spirit that they could have attacked not only
men but also the most savage animals, or even
walls of iron” (11:9). When the battle
commences, to the Epitomist, defeat of the enemy
is just inevitable:
“Under the Lord’s
mercy and with their heavenly ally they came on
in battle array. Like lions they hurled
themselves on the enemy, laid low eleven
thousand foot-soldiers, as well as sixteen
hundred cavalry, and put the remainder to
flight. Most of those who escaped had lost their
weapons and were wounded, and Lysias himself
saved his life, if not his honour, by
ignominiously taking to his heels” (11:10-12).
Lysias had to escape
from the devastating defeat described by the
Epitomist. He was a man who “was no fool, and as
he took stock of the defeat he had suffered he
realized that the Hebrews were invincible,
because God in his power fought on their side”
(11:13). Lysias sends representatives to the
Jews to broker a peace agreement, promising that
the king will be favorable to them (11:14).
Judah Maccabee agrees, especially because “the
king had accepted whatever written terms
Maccabaeus had forward to Lysias from the Jewish
side” (11:15). The Epitomist includes the
Maccabees’ letter to Lysias, which mostly
includes how the two sides were trying to wish
one another well, in the hope of cordial
relations for the future (11:16-21).
The king’s letter,
delivering instructions to Lysias, is also
included (11:21). It is perhaps of no small
importance that King Antiochus first writes,
“Now that our royal father has joined the
company of the gods...” (11:22a). Within the
instruction to Lysias includes a reference to
how the Jews were obviously not prepared to
adopt Greek ways (11:24a), and how it is best
that they remain allowed to observe their own
religion and laws (11:24b). He says, “We hereby
decree that their temple be restored to them and
that they be allowed to regulate their lives in
accordance with their ancestral customs”
(11:25). Lysias is expected to convey this good
intention to the Jewish people (11:26). King
Antiochus also sends a letter to the Jewish
people themselves, granting a period of amnesty
for Jews to return home (11:27-30). Quite
notable is the stipulation, “The Jews may follow
their own food-laws...” (11:31a). Another
interesting part of this section of 2 Maccabees
is the interjection of the Romans Quintus
Memmius and Titus Manilius, who were apparently
active diplomats in the East overseeing Roman
interests.[14]
They too are informed of the new policies of the
Seleucid regime, and have apparently served as
intermediaries on behalf of the Jews (11:32-38).
Simply because a peace
between the new King Antiochus and the Jews has
been established on paper, by no means is an
indication that it is going to be enacted. The
Epitomist is forced to tell his audience more
accounts of where the Jews’ safety was
threatened. After this peace agreement is
brokered, “The Jews busied themselves on their
farms, but they were prevented from leading
stable and tranquil lives by some of the
governors of the region” (12:1b-2a). The
exploits of the Maccabees that are
described—even though the Temple has already
been rededicated—communicate to the Jews’
neighbors that they will defend themselves and
their interests.
“A dastardly atrocity
was perpetuated by the inhabitants of Joppa:
they invited the Jews living among them to
embark with their wives and children in boats
they had provided, giving no indication of any
animosity towards them” (12:3). Apparently,
being a largely non-Jewish city, the people of
Joppa wanted the Jews to peacefully leave, given
the complicated history of recent events. “As it
was a public decision by the whole town and
because they wished to live in peace and
suspected nothing, the Jews accepted; but once
out at sea the people of Joppa sank the boats,
drowning no fewer than two hundred of the Jews”
(12:4). Judah Maccabee hears of this, and orders
up his troops (12:5). Being righteously
indignant, he was “invoking God the just judge,”
falling “upon the murderers” (12:6a). The port
of Joppa was lit on fire during the night
(12:6b). Judah was unable to return to attack
the city itself, as he learned that the people
of Jamnia were planning a similar ploy to the
Jews there. So, Judah attacks Jamnia, lighting
its port and ships on fire—such a sight that the
flames were able to be seen in Jerusalem
(12:7-9).
While the attack on
Jamnia had been a success, the Epitomist
describes that they were set upon by five
thousand Arabs, and five hundred horsemen
(12:10). Only with God’s help in battle were the
Jews victorious (12:11a). Interestingly enough,
seeing the futility of trying to fight the Jews
in the future, “The defeated nomads begged Judas
to make an alliance with them, promising to
supply cattle and to furnish the Jews with all
other assistance” (12:11b). Judas agrees, and
allows the Arabs to return to their tents
(12:12).
Judah Maccabee
continues his campaign of establishing Jewish
dominance over the region. He attacks Caspin, a
walled city (12:13). The people are confident
that their town is sufficiently fortified,
treating “Judas and his men with insolence,
abusing them and uttering the most wicked
blasphemies” (12:14). The Maccabees, though,
call upon “the great Ruler of the universe” who
had defeated Jericho “without the aid of
battering-ram or siege-engine” (12:15). Caspin
was rushed and captured. The Epitomist
describes, “The carnage was indescribable; the
nearby lake, a quarter of a mile wide, appeared
to be overflowing with blood” (12:16).
Judah Maccabee has
every intent on capturing Timotheus, the
governor of the region, who alludes them. His
force makes its way to Charax, a place inhabited
by Tubian Jews (12:17). Timotheus had withdrawn
from the district, yet he did leave behind a
strong garrison (12:18), which the Maccabean
generals Dositheus and Sosipater quickly
destroyed, killing ten thousand (12:19). Judah
Maccabee himself, though, divides his forces
into various sub-units, hurrying in pursuit of
Timotheus, who had a hundred and twenty thousand
infantry and twenty-five hundred cavalry
(12:20). As the Maccabees advance on Timotheus’
force, the Epitomist recounts how “panic seized
the enemy, who were terrified at a hostile
manifestation of the all-seeing One. In headlong
flight they rushed in all directions, so that
frequently they were injured by their own
comrades and run through by the points of their
swords” (12:22). Judah’s forces take advantage
of their confusion, killing thirty thousand
(12:23). Timotheus was captured by the Maccabean
forces commanded by Dositheus and Sosipater, but
was actually able to convince them to let him
go. He was a man of influence, after all, and
could use his power to set free some of the
Jewish family members who had been taken
prisoner (12:24-25).Whether he actually did this
is not stated.
Another stronghold is
attacked at Carnaim, where twenty-five thousand
are killed (12:26). The next target is Ephron, a
city heavily fortified with “a great supply of
engines of war and missiles” (12:27). The Jewish
force once again invoked “the Ruler whose might
shatters the enemy’s strength,” and “made
themselves masters of the town and laid low as
many as twenty-five thousand” (12:28). The
Maccabean forces move again to Scythopolis,
seventy-five miles from Jerusalem (12:29).
There, they are actually told by the Jews that
there was “goodwill shown them by the people and
the kindness with which they had been treated in
times of misfortune” (12:30). Appreciating this,
“Judas and his men thanked them, charging them
to be no less friendly to the Jews in the
future” (12:31a), returning to Jerusalem to
celebrate the Feast of Weeks (12:31b).
When their observance
is over, the Maccabees march against Gorgias,
who was in control of Idumea (12:32). In battle,
he comes out with a force of three thousand men
and four hundred cavalry (12:33), with only a
small number of Jews killed (12:34). In the
battle, a Tubian Jew, Dositheus, “caught hold of
Gorgias by his cloak and was dragging the
villain off by main force, with the object of
taking him alive” (12:35a). Instead, a Thracian
horsemen bore down on him, cutting off his arm,
enabling Gorgias to escape (12:35b).
The fighting against
Gorgias’ force proved exhausting for the
Maccabees, in particular those commanded by
Esdrias (12:36a). So, Judah “appealed to the
Lord to show himself their ally and leader in
battle” (12:36b), and so he issues a battle cry
of hymns in Hebrew to God, launching a surprise
attack (12:37). Later, regrouping his forces,
Judah settles for the Sabbath at Adullam
(12:38). Following this, the bodies of those who
had died were collected for burial (12:39). As
they collect the dead, idolatrous amulets of
Jamnia, forbidden by the Torah, are found, and
this is believed to be the very reason that
these soldiers died (12:40).
Some very interesting
words are then provided by the Epitomist, as
praise is actually issued to God for revealing
this secret (12:41). The Maccabees turn to
praying, especially so that this sin of them
carrying idols can be erased (12:42a). “The
noble Judas exhorted the people to keep
themselves free from wrongdoing, for they had
seen with their own eyes what had happened
because of the sin of those who had fallen”
(12:42b). Monies are collected so that a
sin-offering could be made back in Jerusalem
(12:43a). This is considered to be “a fit and
proper act in which he took due account of the
resurrection” (12:43b). The challenging words to
understand are where the Epitomist describes,
“Had he not been
expecting the fallen to rise again, it would
have been superfluous and senseless to pray for
the dead; but since he had in view the splendid
reward reserved for those who die a godly death,
his purpose was holy and devout. That was why he
offered the atoning sacrifice, to free the dead
from their sins” (12:44-45).
Some later Catholic
theologians would take these words and around
them develop the doctrine of Purgatory, a
temporary place of holding for the righteous
dead until their final sins are extirpated,
enabling them to enter Heaven. Because of the
difficulty of the situation witnessed here in 2
Maccabees, and the literary style of the
Epitomist in summarizing Jason of Cyrene’s
original work, readers need to be cautious in
the conclusions they draw.[15]
Was it really the intention for Judah Maccabee
to atone for the sins of these Jews who had
fallen? Or is this a conclusion of the
Epitomist? Could the original intention of
Judah Maccabee—in at least trying to atone for
these sins—actually been to serve as a warning
to the rest of his living force who had not (at
least to him) used idolatrous amulets?
While we can be
thankful that the editor of 2 Maccabees affirms
the doctrine of resurrection, his hamartology or
theology of sin may be too clouded in his unique
writing style. He may also reflect an ancient
Jewish view that only the righteous were to
experience the resurrection and be welcomed into
the world to come, whereas the Apostolic
Scriptures affirm Daniel 12:2 and the condemned
also experiencing a resurrection unto judgment
(Revelation 20:6). This is ultimately why 2
Maccabees is a part of the Apocrypha or deutero-canon.
The Epitomist’s record
continues, as Judah Maccabee hears that
Antiochus Eupator is marching with a large army
against Judea (13:1), accompanied by Lysias.
This force included one hundred ten thousand
infantry, five thousand three hundred cavalry,
twenty-two elephants, and three hundred special
chariots (13:2). Also joining them was the high
priest Menelaus: “This he did most
disingenuously, not for his country’s good, but
because he believed he would be established in
office” (13:3). It is observed, though, “The
King of kings...stirred up the anger of
Antiochus against this wicked man, and when
Lysias produced evidence that Menelaus was
responsible for all the troubles, the king
ordered him to be taken to Beroea and there
executed in the manner customary at that place”
(13:4). This opportunist, who had committed
heinous deeds against his own people, is finally
rewarded for his sins. The unique method of
death that Menelaus experiences does not go
unnoticed:
“In Beroea there is a
tower some seventy-five feet high, filled with
ashes; it has a circular device sloping down
sheer on all sides into the ashes. This is where
the citizens take anyone guilty of sacrilege or
any other heinous crime, and thrust him to his
doom; and such was the fate of the renegade
Menelaus, who, in accordance with his just
deserts, was not even given burial in the earth.
Many a time he had desecrated the sacred ashes
of the altarfire, and by ashes he met his death”
(13:5-8).
The high priest
Menelaus is apparently thrown into a cremation
cauldron, where in this town, criminals were
executed. Without doing a thorough background
study, suffice it to say this was one of the
worst methods of dying that a Jew—even an
unfaithful one—could experience. Historically,
the Jewish people have extensively frowned on
cremation, believing that God will not be able
to resurrect a body from ashes. According to the
Epitomist, Menelaus was so evil, he had even
desecrated a place where criminals were
dishonored in death.
Simply because
Menelaus is vacated, does not mean that the
Maccabees will have an easy time against
Antiochus Eupator. The Epitomist says, “In
savage arrogance the king came on, aiming to
inflict sufferings on the Jews far worse than
they had endured under his father. When Judas
learnt of this, he ordered the people to invoke
the Lord day and night, and pray that now more
than ever he would come to their aid, since law,
country, and holy temple were all at risk”
(13:9-10). Even though the Temple had been
rededicated, more sustained conflict was on the
scene. Judah Maccabee was insistent that the
Jewish nation not fall into the hands of
idolaters, just as they were starting to rebuild
themselves (13:11). It is stated that at his
orders “They all complied: for three days
without respite they prayed to their merciful
Lord, they wailed, they fasted, they prostrated
themselves” (13:12a).
Judah convenes a
council of war, and it is decided not to wait
for the enemy to invade Judea, taking
Jerusalem—but with the help of God to march out
and fight (13:13). The Epitomist lauds, “He
committed the outcome to the Lord of the
universe, and exhorted his troops to fight nobly
to the death for the law, temple, and city, for
their country and their way of life” (13:14).
Setting camp at Modin, Judah gives his army the
watchword “Victory with God!” and then launches
a secret night attack (13:15a). Two thousand in
the enemy camp are killed, including the death
of the leading elephant (13:15b). This operation
succeeds in creating panic throughout the enemy
camp, with the Epitomist recognizing how the
Maccabees had received help from the Lord
(13:16-17).
It is indicated that
the king “had a taste of Jewish daring”
(13:18a), and so he had to alter his tactics,
specifically by “probing their positions”
(13:18b). Antiochus Eupator advances on Bethsura,
a strong fort, first being repulsed and then
being defeated (13:19). Judah Maccabee sends
supplies to the garrison (13:20), but while this
is happening, a Jewish soldier named Rhodocus is
caught passing secret information to the enemy,
for which he is executed (13:21). Antiochus then
engages with Judah Maccabee’s force directly,
“but had the worse of it” (13:22). Furthermore,
he must quickly return back to the capitol at
Antioch, as Philip, who was administrating the
empire, was trying to fully gain the reigns of
power (13:23a). Being concerned about his
throne, “In consternation the king summoned the
Jews, agreed to their terms, and took an oath to
respect all their rights. After reaching this
settlement he offered a sacrifice, paid honour
to the sanctuary and its precincts, and received
Maccabaeus in a friendly manner” (13:23b-24).
Hegemonides is left as the governor of the
region (13:25a), and Antiochus must quickly
retreat for Antioch (13:25b-26).
The Epitomist narrates
that after three years, Judah Maccabee and his
company hear that Demetrius son of Seleucus had
taken over the country, with a large fleet
arriving at Tripolis with a powerful army
(14:1-2). A certain Alcimus, who had once been
high priest, and who is said to have “willingly
submitted to defilement at the time of the
revolt” (14:3a), takes advantage of Demetrius’
arrival as an opportunity. He goes to King
Demetrius, along with a gold crown and palm, and
special olive branches from the Temple
(14:3b-4). Meeting with Demetrius, Alcimus
hatches his scheme (14:5), informing him that
“Those Jews called Hasidaeans who are led by
Judas Maccabaeus are keeping the war alive and
fomenting sedition; they refuse to let the
kingdom have peace. Thus, although I have been
deprived of my reditary dignity, by which I mean
the high-priesthood, I have two motives in
coming here today” (14:6-7). What Alcimus
intends to do is stated to King Demetrius:
“[F]irst, I have a
genuine concern for the king’s interests; and
secondly, a regard for my fellow-citizens, since
our whole race is suffering considerable
hardship as a result of the senseless conduct of
those people I have mentioned. My advice to your
majesty is to get to know the details of these
matters and then, as befits your universal
kindness and goodwill, make provision for our
country and our beleaguered nation” (14:8-9).
Alcimus’ opportunism
can easily be seen by his word, “For as long as
Judas remains alive there can be no peace for
the state” (14:10). Saying this, other members
of the order of king’s Friends spoke up, adding
“fresh fuel to Demetrius’s anger” (14:11). King
Demetrius selects Nicanor, a commander of the
elephant guard, and makes him the governor of
Judea (14:12). Nicanor is granted a commission
to rout out the Maccabean forces, and see that
Alcimus is installed as high priest (14:13). Any
of the Gentiles in the region, having suffered
by the military actions of Judah Maccabee,
joined to support Nicanor, “supposing that
defeat and misfortune for the Jews would spell
prosperity for them” (14:14).
The Epitomist is still
quite concerned about the religious piety of the
Maccabees, speaking of how “When the Jews heard
of Nicanor’s offensive and the onset of the
Gentiles, they sprinkled dust over themselves
and prayed to him who has established his people
for ever, who never fails to manifest himself
and afford help when his chosen are in need”
(14:15). Having appealed to God for help, the
Maccabean force moves out and meets the enemy at
Adasa (14:16). Simon, Judah’s brother, had
fought with Nicanor, but was deterred (14:17).
Interestingly enough, even though he had a large
military force, the Epitomist can record: “In
spite of this, when Nicanor learnt how brave
Judas and his troops were and how courageously
they fought for their country, he shrank from
deciding the issue by the sword” (14:18).
Emissaries are sent to negotiate a peace
agreement (14:19).
Hearing the proposals,
Judah and his men have a favorable disposition
to accepting them (14:20). When the day comes to
finalize the agreement, special seats are placed
in the middle of the two armies (14:21). Judah
was sure to place “armed men at strategic points
ready to deal with any sudden treachery on the
enemy’s part” (14:22a), but the Epitomist
instead observes how “The discussion between the
two leaders was harmonious. Nicanor stayed some
time in Jerusalem and behaved correctly.
Dismissing the crowds that had flocked from
round about, he kept Judas close to himself at
all times, for he had developed a real affection
for him” (14:22b-24). The Epitomist even says
how Nicanor “urged him to marry and have
children; so Judas married and settled down to
the quiet life of an ordinary citizen” (14:25).
Some kind of peace between the Jewish nation and
their Seleucid Greek neighbors was able to be
concluded.
Alcimus, the one who
convinced King Demetrius that the Maccabees were
a threat to him, gets a copy of the peace
settlement (14:26a). He goes to King Demetrius
“and claimed that Nicanor was pursuing a policy
detrimental to the interests of the state by
appointing Judas, a man guilty of conspiracy, as
king’s Friend designate” (14:26b). King
Demetrius, infuriated, sends Nicanor an order
that Judah Maccabee is to be arrested and sent
to the capitol at Antioch (14:27). The Epitomist
relays how “The instructions dismayed Nicanor,
and he took it hard that he should have to go
back on his agreement when the man had committed
no offence” (14:28). Yet, we find the old axiom
“orders are orders” at work, because “since
there was no gainsaying with the king, he
watched for an opportunity of carrying out the
order by some stratagem” (14:29). Judah Maccabee
notices that Nicanor’s original friendly
disposition toward him had waned, and so he goes
into hiding (14:30).
What can Nicanor do in
enacting the royal order? “Recognizing that he
had been outmanoeuvred by the resolute action of
Judas, Nicanor appeared before the great and
holy temple at the time when the priests were
offering the regular sacrifices, and ordered
them to surrender Judas” (14:31). The priests
swear that they do not know where he is (14:32),
but that is not good enough. “Nicanor stretched
out his right hand towards the shrine and swore
this oath: ‘Unless you surrender Judas to me in
chains, I shall level this sanctuary of God to
the ground and destroy the altar; on this spot I
shall build a temple to Dionysus for all the
world to see” (14:33). Hearing this severe
threat, and knowing that only shortly before the
Temple had been cleansed of defilement, the
priests call out to the Almighty:
“Lord, you have no
need of anything in the world, yet it was your
pleasure that among us there should be a shrine
for your dwelling-place; now, holy Lord from
whom all holiness comes, keep this house, so
recently purified, free from defilement for
ever” (14:35-36).
In order to
demonstrate how serious Nicanor is about Judah
Maccabee being found, he makes an example of a
Jewish man named Razis. He is a distinguished
Jewish leader, for whom the Epitomist issues
some high words: “He was a patriot and very
highly spoken of, one who for his loyalty was
known as Father of the Jews. In the early days
of the revolt he had stood trial for practicing
the Jewish religion, and with no hesitation had
risked life and limb for that cause”
(14:37b-38). So severe did Nicanor want to make
an example of him, five hundred troops are sent
to arrest Razis (14:39), with the intention of
this being “a severe blow to the Jews” (14:40).
Troops pressed against his home compound, with
calls even to burn it down (14:41). Razis
prepares to actually fall on a sword, rather
than being captured, as it was better “to die
nobly rather than fall into the hands of evil
men and be subjected to gross humiliation”
(14:42). With things happening quickly, though,
Nicanor’s troops then poured into his house.
Razis decides on a whim to run up to the wall
around the house, and then throw himself down
into the crowd (14:43-44).
When Razis is found
“He was still breathing and still ablaze with
courage; streaming with blood and severely
wounded as he was, he picked himself up and
dashed through the crowd” (14:45a-b).
Apparently, the fall had not killed him as he
intended, and the Epitomist records a very
gruesome scene indeed: “Finally, standing on a
sheer rock, and now completely drained of blood,
he tore out his entrails and with both hands
flung them at the crowd” (14:45c-46a). To the
Epitomist, Razis died a godly death, “invoking
him who disposes of life and breath to give them
back to him again” (14:16b). Certainly, while
Razis’ self-martyrdom is something that we can
respect, as he by no means gave up his faith in
God or loyalty to the Torah, it is safe to say
that it asks more questions than it answers as
Razis died of causes he created.
The Book of 2
Maccabees ends, as we should expect it to, on a
high note, with one last victory accomplished.
Nicanor receives a report that Judah Maccabee is
in the vicinity of Samaria, and so he plans to
attack him on the Sabbath (15:1). The Epitomist
relays how “Those Jews who were forced to
accompany his army begged him not to carry out
so savage and barbaric a massacre” (15:2a). They
cry, “Have regard for the day singled out and
made holy by the all-seeing One” (15:2b).
Nicanor has no respect for the Jewish religion,
taunting back, “Is there some ruler in the sky
who has ordered the sabbath-day observance?”
(15:3). The Jews he pressed into service
respond, “The living Lord himself is ruler in
the sky, and he commanded the seventh day to be
kept holy” (15:4).[16]
Nicanor’s arrogance prevents him from
considering their claim: “And I am ruler on
earth...I order you to take up arms and do your
duty to the king” (15:5a). For the Epitomist,
though, “he did not succeed in carrying out this
outrage he had planned” (15:5b).
Nicanor’s plan was to
actually “erect a public trophy from the spoils
taken from Judas’s army” (15:6). Yet would he be
able to do this? The Epitomist issues a great
laud for Judah Maccabee, both his piety and
tenacity, in standing up to God-less aggression:
“But Maccabaeus’s
confidence never wavered, and he had not the
least doubt that he would obtain help from the
Lord. He urged his men to have no fear of the
gentile attack, but to bear in mind the aid they
had received from Heaven in the past and look
with confidence to the Almighty for the victory
he would send them on this occasion also. He
drew encouragement for them from the law and the
prophets and, by reminding them of the struggles
they had already come through, filled them with
a fresh ardour. When he had roused their
courage, he issued his orders, reminding them at
the same time of the Gentiles’ broken faith and
perjury. He armed each one of them, not so much
with shield and spear for protection, as with
brave and reassuring words; and he cheered them
all by recounting a dream he had had, a waking
vision worthy of belief” (15:7-11).
The Epitomist details
how Judah Maccabee had seen a motivating vision,
by which Divine approval was given to the
Maccabees’ cause in fighting the Seleucid
Greeks:
“What he had seen was
this: there had appeared to him the former high
priest Onias, a good and noble man of modest
bearing and mild disposition, a ready and apt
speaker, an exemplar from childhood of every
virtue; with uplifted hands Onias was praying
for the whole Jewish community. Next there
appeared in the same attitude a figure of great
age and dignity, whose wonderful air of
authority marked him as a man of the utmost
distinction. Onias then spoke: ‘This is God’s
prophet Jeremiah,’ he said, ‘one who loves his
fellow-Jews and constantly offers prayers for
the people and for the Holy City.’ Extending his
right hand Jeremiah presented a golden sword to
Judas, saying as he did so, ‘Take this holy
sword, a gift from God, and with it shatter the
enemy’” (15:12-16).
Judah Maccabee’s words
had a significant influence on his troops,
especially with the Prophet Jeremiah, a devoutly
righteous man, appearing in his dream. Boys were
able to be as courageous as men (15:17a). They
would all fight decisively, not in a long
campaign, but “by fighting in close combat with
all their courage. This they did because
Jerusalem, their religion, and the temple were
in peril” (15:17b-c). The fear that the
Maccabean soldiers demonstrated was not for
their wives and children, or even their fellow
brothers, but for the sanctity of the Temple
(15:18)—in spite of how those bunkered down in
Jerusalem “were anxious about the outcome of a
battle on open ground” (15:19).
You can definitely
tell that the Epitomist crafts the battle with
Nicanor as a fitting conclusion to his work. He
builds up the intensity, as “All were awaiting
the decisive struggle which lay ahead. The enemy
had already concentrated his forces: his army
drawn up in battle order, the elephants
strategically positioned, and the cavalry ranged
on the flanks. Maccabaeus observed the
deployment of the troops, the variety of their
weapons, and the ferocity of the elephants”
(15:20-21a). All Judah Maccabee can do is what
he has done in previous conflicts: call out
to the Lord. He appeals to God’s previous
intervention, especially as He assisted King
Hezekiah of Judah in fighting the Assyrian
Sennacherib (15:21b-22; cf. 2 Kings 19:35;
Isaiah 37:36). Judah appeals, “Now, Ruler of
heaven, send a good angel once again to go
before us spreading fear and panic. May these
blasphemers who are coming to attack your holy
people be struck down by your strong arm!”
(15:23-24).
Somewhat more than the
previous battles, the Epitomist invokes that
this is as much a spiritual fight, as it is a
physical fight. “Nicanor and his forces advanced
to the sound of trumpets and war-songs, but
Judas and his men engaged the enemy with
invocations and prayers on their lips. Praying
to God in their hearts and greatly cheered by
his care, they killed no fewer than thirty-five
thousand in hand-to-hand fighting” (12:25-27).
Of course, the results of the battle, include
not only a significant number of the enemy dead,
but Nicanor himself is discovered “lying dead in
full armour” (12:28). The Maccabees rejoice in
Hebrew praises (12:29). Judah Maccabee orders
that Nicanor’s head and arm be severed, and
taken to Jerusalem for display (12:30-31). This
is specifically done because of “the hand which
the bragging blasphemer had stretched out
against the Almighty’s holy temple” (12:32).
Nicanor’s tongue is cut out, and Judah orders
that evidence of what he had done be hung up
adjacent to the Temple (12:33).
Great praise is issued
to the Lord in the defeat of Nicanor (12:34-35),
so much so that a decree was issued that this
day would go remembered with a commemoration
occurring in the 13th of Adar (12:36). All the
Epitomist can say is, “Such then, was the fate
of Nicanor, and from that time Jerusalem has
remained in the possession of the Hebrews”
(12:37), an obvious indication that he is
compiling his work during a time of a
significant Jewish presence in Jerusalem.
The Book of 2
Maccabees then comes to an abrupt close,
indicating that the events it recounts stop just
short of the record of Judah Maccabee’s death (1
Maccabees 9:1-22). The Epitomist tells his
audience, “If [my work] is found to be well
written and aptly composed, that is what I
myself aimed at; if superficial and mediocre, it
was the best I could do” (15:38). He actually
compares his summarization work to being like
wine mixed with water, something he considers to
be “a pleasant and delightful taste” (15:39b),
perhaps a reflection of how in his mind, Jason
of Cyrene’s original work was either too potent,
or too dull. His closing remark is, “so too
variety of style in a literary work charms the
ear of the reader. Let this, then, be my final
word” (15:39c).
Similar to the
Epitomist of 2 Maccabees, I have done my best
to summarize his work, narrating it in a way
that will help you appreciate what 2 Maccabees
communicates not only to us as Bible
students—but more specifically Messianic
Believers who see importance in remembering the
Festival of Dedication, Chanukah. Do you
think his Egyptian Jewish readership would have
been convinced that honoring the Festival of
Dedication was a good thing, reflective of not
only Jewish nationalism, but more importantly of
holiness and piety toward God? Were the
Maccabees people that should have been honored,
fighting for the right of the Jewish nation to
survive? Should we remember how God intervened,
or should we treat these things as legends to be
discounted?
The Epitomist of 2
Maccabees is undeniably an artful writer, and he
is more concerned with the spiritual and social
dynamics of the war with the Seleucids than the
author of 1 Maccabees. But no different than 1
Maccabees, 2 Maccabees too records the hard
realities of war. The licentious nature of the
sacrilege committed in the Temple is explained
in more detail than 1 Maccabees. Most
importantly, the religious zeal of the Maccabean
forces is lauded, as opposed to the Maccabees
just being an army trying to repel invaders from
their homeland.
As you read and
compare 2 Maccabees with 1 Maccabees, there are
certainly historical issues to be considered.
The accounts detailed in both books are given
from different vantage points. 2 Maccabees is
more of a literary work than an historical
piece, and we do have to be reminded that we no
longer have Jason of Cyrene’s original
five-volume work for comparison. More than
anything else, although there may be some issues
to examine here or there—somewhat critically
perhaps—2 Maccabees did affect the worldview of
the Jewish people in the First Century C.E. The
terrible hardships and martyrdoms that the
Maccabees endured, influenced how the Jewish
people of Yeshua and the Apostles’ time
interacted with outsiders. The Maccabean martyrs
fought and died for God’s Torah, and would have
rather given up their lives than eat pork.
How did this sentiment affect the spread of the
gospel among the nations in the First Century?
The long-lasting ramifications of 2 Maccabees cannot be overlooked
for their impact on the Jewish social scene as
witnessed in the Apostolic Scriptures.[17]
If you have been blessed by Outreach Israel
Ministries and TNN Online during 2009, you can
help us with a special year-end offering. Your
support is a great blessing to us, as you will
be making
an effort to let us know that you appreciate our
efforts of service. Help us enter into 2010
strong and with confidence to continue.
NOTES